pictograms.info
Facts and data on pictograms Literature

Dogs on Leash

Synonyms / Other Terms Used

Mandatory Leashing of Dogs, Pets on Leash, Leashed Pets, Leash Requirements

Category

Regulations, Permits and Regulations, Management, Mandatory Symbols

Message / Function

To indicate an area where dogs must be kept on a leash
To indicate that dogs are permitted on a leash

 

Source Description
NZS 8603 Outdoor Recreation Symbol No 70: Dogs on Leash NZS 8603 Side view of human figure with dog on leash
Parcs Nationaux de France, 2014, Pictogram No 111: Dogs on Leash (Chien en laisse) PNF 2014 Side view of standing dog on leash
Parks Canada Pictogram 6-1-067: Dogs on Leash Parks Canada Side view of standing dog on leash
Hora page 331, No 24, United Kingdom Forestry Commission: Map Symbol Dogs on Leash UKFC Side view of standing dog on leash
Adrien Coquet: Pictogram No 1311422: Dog, Leash (Noun Project) Coquet Side view of standing dog on leash
U.S. National Park Service, Permits and Regulations, Map Symbol: Pets on Leash U.S. National
Park Service
Side view of standing dog on leash
Pierce, T. (1996): The International Pictograms Standard, page 70, Pictogram Leashed Pets, Animales sujetos con correa Pierce Side view of standing dog on leash
Icon Leash Requirement (Vienna, Leinenpflicht) from Handbuch wien.gv.at Handbuch wien.gv.at Side view of walking dog on leash, dog in outline
ÖBB (Austrian Railways) Pictogram Dogs on Leash (Hunde sind an der Leine zu führen) ÖBB 2007 Side view of walking dog on leash

Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.

Discussion

Basically just two concepts exist to indicate an area where dogs must be kept on a leash or that dogs are permitted on a leash:

Research data on compre­hensibility of symbols concerning this referent is rather limited in our database, but regarding the results, this seems almost sufficient:

Evaluating the Parks Canada’s National Park and National Historic Sites symbols, also regulatory symbols were examined using a Comprehension Test according to ISO 9186. For pictogram No 2-1-004: Dogs on Leash, labeled Parks Canada in the table above, 87 % of the responses were classified as acceptable. With 4 % the answer Designated area for walking dogs was most frequent among the ones judged as unacceptable, and another 4 % answered with Don't know (Ipsos-Reid Corporation, 2004, page 29).

Recommendations

Even though we expect several renderings to be sufficiently compre­hensible, as the test results from Canada indicate, it probably would make sense to examine the importance of specific details, to reach a solution with maximum legibility and to ensure compre­hensibility especially for persons with impaired vision.

After further research concerning available pictogram variants, we recommend to start testing using the Comprehensibility Estimation procedure for eliminating poor variants and identifying the best of the set available, followed by a Comprehension Test. These studies should deliver useful data for recommending the best pictogram. Detailed information about the most frequent responses given in each of the response categories of the Comprehension Test should be provided to correctly judge comprehen­sibility and especially to improve designs.

Tests of pictograms of referent Dogs on Leash

Ipsos-Reid Corporation (2004): Parks Canada Symbol Assessment - Phase 2; Detailed Tables.

See also

No Animals

 

Updated 2026-06-26 by Christoph Brugger