Synonyms / Other Terms Used
Mandatory Leashing of Dogs, Pets on Leash, Leashed Pets, Leash Requirements
Category
Regulations, Permits and Regulations, Management, Mandatory Symbols
Message / Function
To indicate an area where dogs must be kept on a leash
To indicate that dogs are permitted on a leash
| Source | Description | |
|---|---|---|
![]() |
NZS 8603 | Side view of human figure with dog on leash |
![]() |
PNF 2014 | Side view of standing dog on leash |
![]() |
Parks Canada | Side view of standing dog on leash |
![]() |
UKFC | Side view of standing dog on leash |
![]() |
Coquet | Side view of standing dog on leash |
![]() |
U.S. National Park Service |
Side view of standing dog on leash |
![]() |
Pierce | Side view of standing dog on leash |
| Handbuch wien.gv.at | Side view of walking dog on leash, dog in outline | |
![]() |
ÖBB 2007 | Side view of walking dog on leash |
Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.
Discussion
Basically just two concepts exist to indicate an area where dogs must be kept on a leash or that dogs are permitted on a leash:
Research data on comprehensibility of symbols concerning this referent is rather limited in our database, but regarding the results, this seems almost sufficient:
Evaluating the Parks Canada’s National Park and National Historic Sites symbols, also regulatory symbols were examined using a Comprehension Test according to ISO 9186. For pictogram No 2-1-004: Dogs on Leash, labeled Parks Canada in the table above, 87 % of the responses were classified as acceptable. With 4 % the answer Designated area for walking dogs was most frequent among the ones judged as unacceptable, and another 4 % answered with Don't know (Ipsos-Reid Corporation, 2004, page 29).
Recommendations
Even though we expect several renderings to be sufficiently comprehensible, as the test results from Canada indicate, it probably would make sense to examine the importance of specific details, to reach a solution with maximum legibility and to ensure comprehensibility especially for persons with impaired vision.
After further research concerning available pictogram variants, we recommend to start testing using the Comprehensibility Estimation procedure for eliminating poor variants and identifying the best of the set available, followed by a Comprehension Test. These studies should deliver useful data for recommending the best pictogram. Detailed information about the most frequent responses given in each of the response categories of the Comprehension Test should be provided to correctly judge comprehensibility and especially to improve designs.
Tests of pictograms of referent Dogs on Leash
Ipsos-Reid Corporation (2004): Parks Canada Symbol Assessment - Phase 2; Detailed Tables.
See also
Updated 2026-06-26 by Christoph Brugger