pictograms.info
Facts and data on pictograms Literature

Stairs

Synonyms / Other Terms Used

Stair, Steps, Stairway, Staircase

Category

Public Facilities, Guidance & Information, Travel

Message / Function

To indicate the location of stairs. Shall not be used to indicate or identify an escalator.

 

Source Description
Public Information Symbol PI PF 021 (formerly pictogram 011) of ISO 7001: Stairs ISO 7001 Stair profile with two human figures, one walking up, one walking down
Hora page 152: CNIS Pictogram Stairs CNIS Stair profile with two human figures, one walking up, one walking down
Public Facilities A29: Japanese Pictogram Stairs Eco-Mo
Foundation
Stair profile with two human figures, one walking up, one walking down
Austrian Testdesign for Stairs 1) ON Testdesign Stair profile with two human figures, one walking up, one walking down
Austrian Testdesign for Stairs 2) ON Testdesign Stair profile with two human figures, one walking up, one walking down
Dreyfuss page 34: Pictogram Stairs, UP and DOWN Dreyfuss Two human figures on stair profile with floor transitions ending in arrows
Stiebner & Urban page 326, Children's Hospital of Buenos Aires: Pictogram Stairs CHBA Human figure on stair profile walking upwards
Modley & Myers page 119, Transport Canada: Pictogram Stairs TC Human figure with case on stair profile walking upwards
Hora page 89, Symbol Signs Recreational from Parks Canada: Pictogram Stairs PC Human figure on stair profile walking upwards
Modley & Myers page 95: , Summer Olympics Munich 1972 Pictogram Stairs up O'72 Human figure on stair profile walking upwards
Hora page 124, MTA: Pictogram Stairs (Up) MTA Human figure on stair profile walking upwards
BS 8501 Public Information Symbol No 4108 Steps BS 8501:2002 Human figure approaching stair profile
Stairs Up Sign, Moon White by Signbox Signbox Human figure approaching stair profile
Schweiz-Mobil Pictogram: 3-42 Stairs Up Schweiz-Mobil Human figure approaching stair profile from floor transition
Abdullah & Hübner page 159, Zurich Airport: Pictogram Stairs Zurich Airport Human figure approaching stair profile from floor transition
Wiener Linien: Pictogram Stairs Wiener Linien Stair profile with floor transitions
Hora page 111: Pictogram Stairs from Schiphol Airport, Amsterdam Schiphol Stair profile
AIGA Symbol Sign No 10: Stairs AIGA Stair profile
Modley & Myers page 102, Picto'grafics: Pictogram Stairs Picto'grafics Stair profile
Modley & Myers page 117, Seattle-Tacoma Airport (S/TA): Pictogram Stairs S/TA Stair profile
Symbol Signs page 42, Dallas-Fort Worth Airport: Stairs Up D/FW Stair profile ending in floor transition with arrow head
Modley & Myers page 122: Stairs Up, old UIC version UIC Stair profile with floor transitions, arrow head at top
Pictogram Stairs (Schody) by Zuzanna Sekta Sekta Stair profile with hand rails
Smitshuijzen page 349: Stairs Pictogram Smitshuijzen Stair profile, slanted line

Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.

Discussion

In the ISO 1975 Test Series, an international study conducted in Argentinia, Australia, Canada, India, The Netherlands, and Spain (Easterby & Zwaga 1976), the AIGA variant dropped out already at a preliminary stage of research, as it was not among the top six pictograms based on the results of the Appropriateness Ranking Test conducted. Variants ranked best all included representations of persons on stairs.

Looking at the primary misinterpretations revealed in the Comprehension Test conducted in this study, it becomes obvious that they are based on displaying just one person moving into a specific direction (responses like Upstairs, Up, Downstairs, etc.).

In a follow-up Matching Test (Easterby & Zwaga 1976) the three pictogram variants examined all reached about 90 % correct responses.

On basis of these results the AG 133.06 Working Group Pictogram Design created several test designs. Two of them - marked with 1) and 2) in the table above - then were examined applying a Comprehension Test conducted in Austria (Brugger, 1979). Both variants exceeded minimum requirements defined by ISO, but with 82 % correct responses variant 1) seemed to be a slightly better solution. After a further redesign this concept finally was used as ISO guideline example.

In the Japanese study to propose domestically unified graphical symbols based on scientific methods, the pictogram variant labeled as Eco-Mo Foundation proved to be well comprehensable with a comprehension score of 89.7 (Eco-Mo Foundation, 2001). The positive results for this variant, which corresponds to ISO Public Information Symbol PI PF 021 concerning the verbal description of the image content, confirm the work of ISO/TC 145/SC 1.

Recommendation

PI PF 021 (formerly pictogram 011) of ISO 7001: Stairs

We recommend using Public Information Symbol PI PF 021 (formerly pictogram 011) of ISO 7001, which was developed to eliminate the aspect of direction by displaying two persons with differing walking direction. Where the stairs are unidirectional, the figure walking up or the figure walking down should be omitted, as appropriate.

Tests of pictograms of referent Stairs

Brugger, Ch. (1979): Abschlußbericht über den Erkennungstest. Report to the Austrian Standards Institute (ON) dated 09/79, Vienna.

Easterby, R.S. & Zwaga, H.J.G. (1976): Evaluation of Public Information Symbols, ISO Tests: 1975 Series. AP Report 60, Department of Applied Psychology, University of Aston, Birmingham, March 1976.

Eco-Mo Foundation (2001): Test data of public information symbols in Japan - Procedure for the testing of public information symbols by the Study Committee. ISO: ISO/TC 145/SC 1 N 329.

See also

Escalator,  Elevator

 

Updated 2023-10-12