Synonyms / Other Terms Used
Arrivals, Flight Arrivals
Category
Transportation, Transport Facilities, Travel, Tourism
Message / Function
To indicate the location of flight arrivals
Source | Description | |
---|---|---|
PORT | Plan view of aircraft pointing downwards | |
Zurich Airport | Side view of aircraft descending, three dots indicating landing gear | |
D/FW | Side view of aircraft descending, three dots indicating landing gear | |
Dreyfuss | Side view of aircraft approaching runway, arrow pointing downwards | |
O'72 | Side view of aircraft approaching runway, three dots indicating landing gear | |
Picto'grafics | Side view of aircraft approaching runway, three dots indicating landing gear | |
TC | Side view of aircraft approaching runway, three dots indicating landing gear | |
Düsseldorf Airport |
Side view of aircraft approaching runway, two dots indicating landing gear | |
ADV | Side view of aircraft approaching runway, two dots indicating landing gear | |
Eco-Mo Foundation |
Side view of aircraft approaching runway, dot indicating landing gear | |
PANYNJ | View of aircraft approaching runway, dot indicating landing gear | |
EJP | View of aircraft approaching runway | |
ICAO | View of aircraft approaching runway | |
ISO 7001 | Side view of aircraft landing on runway, three dots indicating landing gear | |
Icograda | Arc indicating descent ending at side view of aircraft above runway | |
FA | Plan view of aircraft within box facing inside | |
Icograda | Plan view of aircraft entering box | |
ATA | Plan view of aircraft, arrow pointing away from aircraft | |
Icograda | Plan view of descending airplane, person walking away | |
AIGA | Passenger with up-raised arm | |
Icograda | Flexed arrow pointing towards horizontal bar at bottom | |
Icograda | Horizontal arrow pointing towards filled circle |
Note: Some of the examples shown above were mirrored horizontally to contrast differences.
Discussion
In the ISO 1979/80 test series (Easterby & Graydon 1981) twelve pictogram variants of the referent Arrival were tested. No variant tested for comprehension reached an acceptable number of correct responses. As the message in these tests was not restricted to flight arrivals, also the assignment to available categories was not perfect. Regarding this and the additional fact, that no context information was offered, the results of that study should be interpreted with care.
Also in the Japanese study to propose domestically unified graphical symbols based on scientific methods, the pictogram variant tested did not elicit a sufficient percentage of correct answers. The comprehension score for the pictogram labeled as Eco-Mo Foundation was only 22.5 (Eco-Mo Foundation, 2001).
The authors of the Symbol Signs study (AIGA, 1993) discuss several issues concerning this referent:
A study by Zwaga & Poppinga offers another insight of problems concerning the message: while most respondents were able to describe all elements of a variant similar to the version from the Eco-Mo Foundation, only 51 % responded correctly concerning the meaning of this symbol.
Another aspect should be regarded: A simplified plan view of an airplane similar to the variant marked PORT is used to indicate the location of an airport; accordingly, a plan view of an airplane alone should not be used to signify something else.
Recommendation
Based on the test results available we recommend using a pictogram similar to public information symbol PI TF 016: Flight Arrivals from ISO 7001.
Tests of pictograms of referent Arrivals / Arriving Flights
Easterby, R.S. & Graydon, I.R. (1981): Evaluation of Public Information Symbols: ISO Test: 1979/80 Series. Part I: Appropriateness Ranking Tests. AP Report 99, Applied Psychology Department, University of Aston in Birmingham, January 1981.
Easterby, R.S. & Graydon, I.R. (1981): Evaluation of Public Information Symbols: ISO 1979/80 Test Series. Part II: Comprehension/Recognition Tests. AP Report 100, Applied Psychology Department, University of Aston in Birmingham, January 1981.
Eco-Mo Foundation (2001): Test data of public information symbols in Japan - Procedure for the testing of public information symbols by the Study Committee. ISO: ISO/TC 145/SC 1 N 329.
Zwaga, H.J.G. & Poppinga, J.: Identification and Legibility of Graphic Symbols; Towards a standard for public information symbols. Internal Report, Psychological Laboratory, University of Utrecht
See also
Airport, Departures / Departing Flights
Updated 2023-09-28 by Ch.Brugger